Networks of Resistance in European Print Culture

A Copy of Verses… Philip Robinson Library, Newcastle University, UK. Special Collections. Broadsides: 8/1/6. Reproduced with kind permission.

This year I have been involved with a group of colleagues at Newcastle University who are interested in the theme of ‘Networks of Resistance in European Print Culture’. From our very first meeting back in September, I was struck by the parallels across time and space, with similar themes and issues emerging in very different contexts. Since then we have established a reading group, which devoted its first meeting to John McMillian's article '"Our Founder, the Mimeograph Machine": Participatory Democracy in Students for a Democratic Society's Print Culture', and held a session in the Philip Robinson Library at which several of us presented an item or items from Special Collections as a way of introducing our own research in the area. Across these sessions, several themes have emerged.

The first is the value of ephemera. All of the works discussed in the two sessions were ephemeral in one sense or another. In the Library session, Melanie Wood and Rachel Anderson presented a series of miners' songs from the nineteenth century. Not only do they provide an insight into an oral culture that would often be lost to historians, but the songs are rare (they do not appear on the British Folksong Index) and the broadsides fragile. Yet they offer an important insight into the miners' strikes that took place in Northumberland and Durham in the early 1830s and 1840s, the issues surrounding those strikes, and the culture of solidarity among the miners.

Roger de Rabutin, comte d Bussy, Histoire amoureuse des Gaules (1708). Philip Robinson Library, Newcastle University, UK. Special Collections. Bradshaw 848.4.BUS. Reproduced with kind permission.

The item presented by Joseph Hone, while less obviously ephemeral in its material form, fits the model described by Robert Darnton of works that were very popular in their own time, but have been largely forgotten today (Robert Darnton, The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France. London, 1996). Histoire Amoureuse des Gaules by Roger de Rabutin, Comte de Bussy, was, as Joe explained, a scandalous presentation of the sex lives of the French King and royal family that Rabutin wrote to entertain his mistress. Originally produced as a manuscript for private circulation, the work was leaked and quickly became a best seller. While intended for titillation and entertainment, like eighteenth-century works of political pornography described by Darnton, it had political resonance and impact by undermining respect for royalty

Thomas Spence, Pigs’ Meat, or, lessons for the swinish multitude, second edition (London, 1795). Philip Robinson Library, Newcastle University UK. Special Collections. Rare Books: RB 331.04 PIG. In this image it is possible to see the different types of paper used in this volume.

Thomas Spence's Pigs' Meat, which was the focus of my short presentation, was also a deliberately ephemeral work. Its cheap format made it affordable for ordinary working people who were Spence's target audience. By selling the periodical for just 1d per weekly issue, and by filling it with short extracts from a range of contemporary and historic political works, Spence was making political ideas accessible to those who might not normally come into contact with them. As he examined the physical copy, Joe Hone discovered that the work was actually even more ephemeral than we had realised. He noticed that the format was unusual. Not only are the sheets folded into three rather than the more usual four or eight, but the paper used to make the pages is not uniform. It would appear that this second edition of the first volume was produced from off-cuts that were perhaps lying around in Spence's shop. In this sense the miscellany format of the content of the work - composed of a series of extracts from different authors - is matched by the miscellaneous nature of the physical object itself.

If Spence had been a student in 1960s America he would no doubt have been a member of the organisation Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and a keen user of their mimeograph machine. This early form of photocopier was used by SDS members to produce their own materials - including a regular newsletter (initially called Discussion Bulletin) and to copy correspondence written by members of the group. The nature of the bulletin was simultaneously ephemeral - in that it was cheaply produced - and a way of sharing ideas beyond the organisation's leadership.

This hints at an answer to the second theme prompted by these discussions: why works of this nature were printed at all. This is a particularly pertinent question in the case of the miners' songs, given that many of the miners themselves were illiterate and the songs would have been shared orally rather than relying on printed dissemination

The first, and most obvious, answer is that putting ephemera into print was a means of communication; of spreading ideas beyond face-to-face meetings and in doing so building a wider network or community. In the case of the miners we can perhaps see one consequence of this in the visit by William Roberts, a leading Bristol Chartist, to the miners in the North East to offer them his support. We cannot know for sure, but perhaps Roberts heard about the situation in Northumberland and Durham via the printed songs. They would certainly have been a good means of spreading news of the strikes to miners and political campaigners elsewhere in the country to encourage solidarity.

William Walker Story and George Watson, The Pitmen’s Union. Philip Robinson Library, Newcastle University, UK. Special Collections. Broadsides 8/1/3. Reproduced with kind permission. This song includes reference to the Chartist William Roberts and his support for the north east miners.

Spence was also a keen writer and disseminator of songs. Several appear in Pigs' Meat itself, but there are also three collections of Spencean songs that were printed separately in the early nineteenth century. Spence had been writing songs since he was in Newcastle in the 1770s, and intended them to be sung at meetings of likeminded people. In the 1790s Spence was involved with the London Corresponding Society (LCS), a vehicle through which un-enfranchised artisans and workers campaigned for parliamentary reform. There is some evidence that songs were sung at LCS meetings and the society made great use of print more generally as a means of creating and expanding its community.

The SDS reminded me in various ways of the LCS and here too, as McMillian argued, print culture was key. He suggested that it was a good means of eliciting support for the organisation and building a sense of community - particularly over wider distances. Moreover in sharing ideas in print, and even reproducing private correspondence by members, the SDS leaders were modelling the kind of open democratic society they wanted to see on a national level.

McMillian also suggested a second reason why members of the SDS were keen to deploy print, one that I touched on in last month's blogpost. As some members acknowledged, the SDS's use of print opened opportunities for less socially confident members. Some who remained quiet in face-to-face meetings were much more articulate in print. In this sense print could be a more accessible medium for marginalised groups, including women and ethnic minorities. In the same way, the use of print by the LCS perhaps offered a route into political discussions (and perhaps even a voice) to labouring people who had not previously had the opportunity to express their political views.

The Pitmen’s Agreement. A New Song… Philip Robinson Library, Newcastle University, UK. Special Collections: Broadsides 8/1/16. Reproduced with kind permission.

A third reason for putting words into print is that it can be seen as giving legitimacy to the claims made, or ensuring a lasting record of those claims. This is perhaps most resonant in the case of the miners' protest songs. As noted above, many miners would not have been able to read the broadsides, but also would not have needed to since they knew the songs by heart and were familiar with the events they were describing. The broadsides were perhaps useful, though, in legitimising the miners' cause not just to others at the time but also to posterity. Melanie and Rachel noted that the local Newcastle newspapers had tended to be neutral on the events described in the songs. Perhaps printing the songs was a means for the miners to put their side of the case to a wider public.

Spence did something similar when he found himself on the wrong side of the authorities. In The Case of Thomas Spence he offered an account of the circumstances of his arrest and subsequent release for selling seditious books in 1792. In The Important Trial of Thomas Spence he offered a full account of his 1803 trial, presented from his own perspective, perhaps to counter the official newspaper reports. The same might also be true of an organisation like the SDS - particularly in its early years when it was seeking to establish itself - with print being used as a way to gain status and legitimacy.

Here we see the title page of the Comte de Bussy’s work with its false imprint.

One final theme that was prompted by the workshop was the value and reliability - or unreliability - of imprints. In my work on Spence I have been using the information given on the title pages of his pamphlets to build a chronology of his bookselling businesses - identifying which premises he operated from and when he moved from one to another. As Joe pointed out in his talk, not all imprints can be used in this way. The title page of Histoire Amoureuse des Gaules gives the printer as Pierre Marteau of Cologne. As Joe noted, very few books were printed in Cologne at this time, since the city probably only had two presses. The use of a false imprint was particularly common in the case of scandalous or seditious books, and 'Pierre Marteau, Cologne' was a very common example of this which was used across Europe in the early modern period. We explored whether false imprints were genuinely intended to hide, and therefore protect, the printer (given that other elements of the copies such as the wood cut ornaments could have been used for identification) or whether the false imprint was a signal to readers interested in scandalous material. In the late seventeenth century 'Amsterdam' was often used as a false imprint for English books that showed some sympathy for republican government. Of course, as the Library staff observed, the use of false imprints presents problems for those involved in cataloguing works. The convention when cataloguing is to transcribe the information on the title page. If some of that information is false, then the catalogue itself is corrupted as a result. As this would suggest, there is much to learn from paying careful attention to the material form and paratextual elements of ephemeral material.

Information Revolutions

Printing press in the collection of Thin Ice Press at the University of York. Image by Rachel Hammersley, 2023.

Our second semester started at the very end of January and this year we have embarked on a new early modern MA module 'The First Information Revolution? Print Culture and the Public Sphere in Early Modern Europe'. The title deliberately signals potential parallels with today, and it has felt like a particularly auspicious time to be discussing the impact of the invention of the printing press on life in the early modern period. The news this month has been full of issues relating to our current information revolution: should teenagers have access to their smart phones while in school? Should under sixteens be prevented from accessing social media? How is AI going to impact on our lives, and should we be moving cautiously or seizing the initiative? Looking around us we can see the impact that the digital revolution is having on all aspects of life and society, and we hear daily the worries and portents this generates. Perhaps this makes us better able to imagine how it felt for those who were alive in the immediate aftermath of Gutenberg's invention, and to understand their excitement at the new development, as well as their concerns about its potentially dangerous consequences.

In teaching the module I have been particularly struck by three parallels. First, the expansion of the opportunities for people to communicate with one another that both information revolutions delivered. Secondly the huge increase in the sheer amount of information circulating, which, in both cases, could lead to people feeling swamped or overwhelmed. Thirdly, the fact that changes to the form in which information is conveyed prompts questions about what counts as trustworthy information.

Richard Price depicted with his books behind him. By Thomas Holloway, after Benjamin West. National Portrait Gallery. NPG D5557. Reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence.

Initially the invention of the printing press, and the explosion of print it brought in its wake, generated new possibilities for communication and engagement among those who were already literate, and in particular scholars and the members of the so-called republic of letters. The historian Ann Blair has observed that whereas medieval readers were generally shown reading a single text, early moderns were often presented consulting several at once, and we can think too of the wealth of images from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries depicting scholars surrounded by their books (Ann Blair, 'Reading Strategies for Coping with Information Overload', Journal of the History of Ideas 64:1 (2003): 15-16). Moreover, Elizabeth Eisenstein, whose book The Printing Revolution initiated the debate on this topic, made the point that the shift to a world in which there were multiple copies of the same work, each bearing the same pagination, facilitated scholarly discussion even over great distances. Scholars living and working in different parts of the world could refer to the same text and correspond about the ideas presented on the same page, confident that they were discussing the same thing (Elizabeth Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 348)

Satirical print of John Wilkes by William Hogarth. Image from the author’s collection. Rachel Hammersley, 2025.

Of particular importance was that, as time went on, the print revolution also began to open opportunities to new individuals and groups. Eisenstein makes the point that whereas previously those wanting to exercise political influence had to be capable of eloquent speech, by the eighteenth century we see the rise of figures who were better with the pen than the tongue, including Thomas Paine, John Wilkes, Camille Desmoulins, and Jacques-Pierre Brissot (Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution, p. 331. By chance I also came across a modern parallel of this idea this month when I read John McMillian's article, on the role of print culture in the 1960s organisation Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), for a reading group with colleagues. McMillian emphasised the importance of the written word for this society and observed that the organisation's emphasis on print opened opportunities for participation to those who did not just 'talk the loudest at meetings' - including some of the female participants. This indicates that print could provide platforms for marginalised groups.

‘London Corresponding Society, alarm’d’ by James Gillray, published by Hannah Humphrey. National Portrait Gallery. NPG D12634. Reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence. Though satirical, this image gives a sense of the role of print for the LCS.

Print was crucial to the activities of the London Corresponding Society, which was established in 1792. While it was not the first reform society in Britain, it was distinctive in that its members were primarily un-enfranchised artisans and workers who campaigned directly for parliamentary reform. Improvements in literacy levels - especially in London - meant that print could be crucial to its activities. Information about meetings was conveyed via printed posters and leaflets, minutes of meetings were carefully taken, and members were encouraged to read and discuss key political texts

While the expansion of opportunities for communication and the opening up of the scholarly and political worlds to new groups as a result of print could bring positive benefits, the experience of information overload was a genuine phenomenon. The historian Paul M. Dover has demonstrated that the volume and variety of things that were written down in the early modern period was much greater than it had ever been before, and Eisenstein too commented on the marked shift from the scarcity of manuscripts to the abundance of printed material (Paul M. Dover, The Information Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 14; Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution, p. 342). As a result, early modern people had to grapple with far more information than their predecessors. Ann Blair argues, that they quickly developed strategies for doing so. They adjusted their reading methods depending on their purpose and what they were seeking to get from the material. They also developed new techniques and resources to help them to cope. Moreover, then, as now, the increasing reliance on shortcuts and reference tools was bemoaned by some. (Blair, 'Reading Strategies', p. 16).

Perhaps not surprisingly the increase in information coupled with the change in the form in which it was conveyed, prompted questions to be raised regarding trustworthiness and reliability. Dover observes that in the Middle Ages information that was presented in written form was viewed as less reliable than oral accounts due to the fact that the source was not always immediately evident. Previously the veracity of the information being conveyed was partly dependent on the reputation of the person uttering it. Writing broke the direct connection back to the source, and so the reliability of the information was tainted as a result. Consequently, Dover notes, print sources were not immediately seen as trustworthy, and this was only heightened by the awareness of errors and irregularities in early print. Gradually, though, attitudes shifted, with print growing in trustworthiness on account of it being verifiable. By the late eighteenth century the Marquis de Condorcet was arguing that print shifted the balance between mere eloquence and solid reason - reducing the power of the former and increasing the role of the latter as the criterion by which information should be judged. Of course, we might observe that it is just as possible to deceive through eloquent writing as through eloquent speech.

Title page from Thomas Spence’s Pigs’ Meat (London, 1793-1795). One of the original early modern texts examined in our Library Workshop. Philip Robinson Library, Newcastle University. Special Collections: RB 331.04 PIG. Reproduced with kind permission.

Yet, I have been heartened by our students' response to the module and the issues it raises. While they are a self-selecting group, they were thoughtful about the issues discussed and well aware of the need to think about the sources and reliability of the information presented to them, both when working as historians and in their everyday lives. Moreover, despite being digital natives, their excitement at being able to handle original copies of early modern books at our library workshop was palpable and they were thoughtful and perceptive about what is gained by handling the physical book rather than simply reading it on a screen. As rumours circulate that we are not far from a time in which AI tools could be used to set, produce, and mark student assignments without any human involvement in the process at all, it has been reassuring to spend time with students who are keen to engage with early modern printed material, to analyse it carefully, and to offer their own views and interpretations of it. Perhaps there is hope that just as the invention of print did not bring about 'the downfall of civilisation' in the way that some feared, our own digital revolution need not do so either.